Intellectual Property

Challenge to Gene Patents

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:11:44 -0500

On February 9, 2010, a United Kingdom appeals court, in Eli Lilly and Co. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc., case number A3/2008/2673, upheld a lower court decision to invalidate a patent claiming an isolated nucleic acid encoding a Neutrokine-alpha protein. The appeals court held the patent invalid for lack of "industrial application," despite the fact that the patent provided not only the sequence information but also suggested several therapeutic utilities of the sequences. Nonetheless, the court determined that the claimed nucleic acid had undetermined function, thus rendering the patent invalid.

For more information, please click here.

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Bilski v. Kappos

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:19:38 -0500

The Supreme Court agreed earlier this year to hear the Bilski case and address the question of whether the "machine-or-transformation" test enunciated last year by the Federal Circuit is appropriate for determining patent-eligible subject matter.

For more information, please click here.

State Regulator Files Final Massachusetts Data Security Regulations: Retains March 1, 2010 Effective Date

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:14:16 -0500

The Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (OCABR) filed final Data Security Regulations on November 4, 2009, retaining the March 1, 2010 effective date. As reported in prior Alerts, persons who have access to personal information regarding Massachusetts residents in connection with business or employment must have a written information security plan in place by the effective date. The requirements of the Regulations were summarized in the Alert we published on September 25, 2009.

For more information, please click here.

FTC Postpones Enforcement of Red Flags Rule: U.S. District Court Holds Rule Not Applicable to Lawyers

Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:57:20 -0500

There have been two important developments recently regarding the Federal Trade Commission’s Red Flags Rule.
The Red Flags Rule requires financial institutions and creditors to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs. These programs must provide for the identification, detection, and response to patterns, practices, or specific activities -- known as "red flags" -- that could indicate identity theft. Generally speaking, the Rule applies to all persons who regularly permit consumers to defer payment for goods and services purchased. An obvious example of a "creditor" that is subject to the Rule is an automobile dealer; a less obvious example is a lawn mowing service that provides the service and subsequently sends a bill.

For more information, please click here.

Massachusetts Date Security Regulations

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:29:59 -0400

The Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (OCABR) held what is likely to be its last public hearing on the proposed Data Security Regulations on September 22, 2009. The Regulations are expected to be finalized, substantially in their current form, during the month of October. Compliance is mandatory by March 1, 2010.

For more information, please click here.

Prometheus Laboratories v. Mayo Collaborative Services

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:26:26 -0400

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the Court that hears all patent appeals) issued a favorable decision for medical diagnostic companies and others yesterday in the case of Prometheus Laboratories v. Mayo Collaborative Services (--- F.3d ----, 2009 WL 2950232 (C.A.Fed., 2009)).

For more information, please click here.

Like-Kind Exchanges of Trademarks and Trade Names: IRS Revises Position

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:24:03 -0400

Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that certain exchanges of like-kind property may be exchanged without producing taxable income. However, the Treasury Regulations adopted to clarify and explain Section 1031 provide that the goodwill or going-concern value of a business is not of like-kind to the goodwill or going-concern value of another business. Based on the Treasury Regulations, exchanges of goodwill or going-concern value of a business for the goodwill or going-concern value of another business will not qualify for Section 1031 non-recognition treatment. Historically, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concluded that trademarks and trade names were too closely related to the goodwill or going-concern value of a business to be eligible for Section 1031 non-recognition (TAM 200602034). Recently, in Chief Counsel Advice 200911006, the IRS rejected this position and stated that intangibles such as trademarks, trade names, mastheads, and customer-based intangibles that can be separately described and valued apart from goodwill qualify as like-kind property under Section 1031.

For more information, please click here.

Massachusetts Data Security Regulations: The Latest Developments

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:13:33 -0400

On Friday, January 16, 2009, the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (OCABR) held a public hearing concerning the recently extended Massachusetts data security regulations (201 CMR 17.00). The Regulations, described by many speakers at the hearing as the nation’s most cumbersome data security regulations, require all entities that license, store or maintain personal information about a Massachusetts resident to implement a comprehensive information security program. Compliance with many of the Regulation’s provisions is required by May 1, 2009.

For more information, please click here.

The U.S. Freedom of Information Act: Negative Emails About Competitor Need Not Be Produced

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:11:28 -0400

Government contractors sometimes pursue the disclosure of competitor information through requests under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act1 ("FOIA"). When a contractor is notified that the government may reveal confidential information in response to a FOIA request, that contractor has the right to assert that its confidential information be exempted from disclosure.

For more information, please click here.

Five Reasons to do a Trademark Audit

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:36:15 -0400

While a company's brands are among its most critical and valuable business assets, too little attention is usually devoted to identifying, developing, protecting and exploiting those assets. Gaps in trademark asset protection are often not discovered until a company seeks to enforce, or is forced to defend, its brands and encounters obstacles that could have been avoided. As trademark litigators, we have seen many circumstances where gaps in trademark protection could have been easily closed if they had been noticed.

For more information, please click here.

Compliance Deadlines Extended But Comprehensive Data Security Regulations Still Looming in Massachusetts

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:11:26 -0400

Following on the heels of major data security breaches at TJ Maxx and other companies, the Massachusetts Legislature enacted a data security law intended to protect consumers’ personal information. On September 19, 2008, the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation (OCABR) issued regulations prescribing specific policies and practices that must be adopted to comply with the law. OCABR’s regulations establish requirements that far exceed data security provisions under federal law or the law of other states. Therefore, even businesses that have adopted security “best practices” or who – like banks and other financial service providers – have been subject to federal privacy and security laws for many years, will need to implement new security procedures to comply with the Massachusetts law.

For more information, please click here.